純美蘋果園
TRPG討論區 => 研討區 => 3版 討論區 => 主题作者是: xiezhenggang 于 2014-08-12, 周二 03:23:21
-
如果把魔法盾牌当武器用，并且想增强效果，价格怎么算？
增强加值不会增加武器伤害，那我想提高伤害又该怎么弄？
比如说，一面+3盾牌，想要当做+1炽焰武器？或者本来是+1盾牌，想要弄成+2幽冥？价格分别累计？同一面盾牌有两个独立的增强加值？
如果把上述附魔效果改为盾刺的话，可以叫+3盾牌（附+1炽焰盾刺），但直接盾牌呢？
-
给老谢解答这个简单问题的机会我让给楼下的你们，不谢！ :em019
-
我觉得盾牌本身不能武器附魔。魔法武器必须是精制武器，但精制盾牌不是精制武器。
/me 赶翻译中，老谢莫催。
-
我觉得盾牌本身不能武器附魔。魔法武器必须是精制武器，但精制盾牌不是精制武器。
/me 赶翻译中，老谢莫催。
You strap a shield to your forearm and grip it with your hand. A light shield’s weight lets you carry other items in that hand, although you cannot use weapons with it.
Shield Bash Attacks: You can bash an opponent with a light shield, using it as an off-hand weapon instead of using it for defense. Used this way, a light shield is a martial bludgeoning weapon. For the purpose of penalties on attack rolls, treat a light shield as a light weapon. If you use your shield as a weapon, you lose its AC bonus until your next action (usually until the next round). An enhancement bonus on a shield does not improve the effectiveness of a shield bash made with it, but the shield can be made into a magic weapon in its own right.
-
我因为最近玩了个美队飞盾build，所以有和DM讨论过这个问题
后来就是简单的分别算
比如+1 ac +1 武器盾牌
就是+1000+2000，防御和武器附魔分开算
-
Even though some types of armor and shields (such as spiked shields) can be used as weapons, you can’t create a masterwork version of such an item that confers an enhancement bonus on attack rolls. Instead, masterwork armor and shields have lessened armor check penalties (see Masterwork Armor, page 126).
-
Shield Bash Attacks: You can bash an opponent with a heavy shield,
using it as an off-hand weapon. See Table 7–5: Weapons for the
damage dealt by a shield bash. Used this way, a heavy shield is a martial
bludgeoning weapon. For the purpose of penalties on attack
rolls, treat a heavy shield as a one-handed weapon. If you use your
shield as a weapon, you lose its AC bonus until your next action
(usually until the next round). An enhancement bonus on a shield
does not improve the effectiveness of a shield bash made with it, but
the shield can be made into a magic weapon in its own right.
phb p.125
顺便楼上是p.122的内容，在武器那栏，而不是防具
-
规则矛盾了？Then drop it.
就合理性而言，我支持盾牌的防具和武器部分（包括是否精制）分开算。