作者 主题: 同样一个小问题。。。  (阅读 2430 次)

副标题: AO中的AO

离线 庞西瓦

  • Luck Coin of Tymoran
  • Chivary
  • *****
  • 帖子数: 1023
  • 苹果币: 0
    • http://
同样一个小问题。。。
« 回帖 #10 于: 2008-01-27, 周日 22:08:34 »
引用
ao本身实际上不算action

这句话有出处嘛?AO上说一个借机攻击就是一次近战攻击,而近战攻击本身是个标准动作,说AO不算ACTION好象没啥道理
规则内没有地方说ao算作任何action,而且实际上ao也不符合任何action的条件,能够在不轮到自己行动时进行的action只有直觉动作,而ao并不是直觉动作,根据规则一轮内只能做出一个标准+类移(或者是全轮)+一个迅捷或直觉+若干自由动作,而当你作出这所有的动作之后,你仍然可以进行ao,因此有理由认为ao独立于action系统之外,还有值得注意的是即使是5尺快步和延迟也被归入了no action,而ao仍然没有被归入Table: Actions in Combat。
« 上次编辑: 2008-01-27, 周日 22:09:41 由 庞西瓦 »
迷失前,忠言在耳边,瑕疵遍布的爱恋,渴望永久多少年

离线 逆神猪

  • 满地乱滚的猪
  • Flawless
  • *******
  • 帖子数: 5961
  • 苹果币: -2
同样一个小问题。。。
« 回帖 #11 于: 2008-01-27, 周日 22:46:09 »
When an Attack of Opportunity Provokes an Attack of Opportunity

In some cases, you can make an attack of opportunity that provokes an attack of opportunity against you. For example, a foe runs past you, leaving a square you threaten and provoking an attack of opportunity from you. If you choose to disarm your foe, you'll provoke an opportunity from that foe (unless you're out of the foe's reach).

Attack of Opportunity Chains: If both you and your foe have multiple attacks of opportunity, the two of you could set up a whole chain of attacks of opportunity. For example, you try to disarm, provoking an attack of opportunity. Your foe responds by attempting to disarm you, and you respond with another disarm attempt.

When this situation occurs, simply allow both foes to keep going with attacks of opportunity until one of them either runs out of attacks of opportunity or chooses not to make any more. Keep track of all the attacks of opportunity each combatant provokes and makes. Resolve the final attack of opportunity in the chain first, and then work forward along the chain until you've resolved all of them or until one opponent's attack of opportunity foils the other's action.

Let's return to our previous example: Let's say you have three attacks of opportunity available and your foe has two.

You make a disarm attempt when your opponent moves past you (attack of opportunity #1). This provokes an attack of opportunity from your foe.

Your foe decides to disarm you in turn (attack of opportunity #2). This provokes an attack of opportunity from you.

You decide to disarm again (attack of opportunity #3).

Your foe also decides to disarm again (attack of opportunity #4 and your foe's second and last attack of opportunity).

You decide to disarm yet again (attack of opportunity #5 and your third and last attack of opportunity).

Your foe would like to disarm you again, but he's out of attacks of opportunity, so that's the end of the chain.

Resolve attack of opportunity #5 first; if you succeed, your foe no longer threatens you and can't continue, bringing the whole process to an end. If you fail to disarm your foe, move on to attack of opportunity #4; now your foe has a chance to end the process by disarming you. Continue until one of you is disarmed or until all the attacks of opportunity are resolved.


 :em006  :em006  
这个人已经懒得什么都不想留下了

离线 Leaf

  • 新人
  • *********
  • 帖子数: 13894
  • 苹果币: -5
同样一个小问题。。。
« 回帖 #12 于: 2008-01-27, 周日 23:34:24 »
这本来就和MTG的堆栈一样嘛
1.这些事都有合理解释,但出于安全考虑,不能公开。
2.由于降低了预算,监管力量削弱才有了这一疏忽。
3.该实验值得一做,并已经停止,得到了大量珍贵数据。还提供了就业。
4.有些重要信息,尘埃落定以后我们才能得知。下不为例。
5.由个人决策失误引起,已根据内部纪律条例予以处理。