作者 主题: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?  (阅读 2828 次)

副标题:

离线 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔

  • 世间万物都需要锱铢必较
  • Flawless
  • *******
  • 帖子数: 5997
  • 苹果币: 6
  • LV5滥弱
3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 于: 2014-04-17, 周四 23:02:12 »
今天讨论的时候,某人表示,使用灼热射线的角色,会因为“施法”和“做出射击攻击”而各自产生一个被AO的机会,但我觉得这既然是一个动作里面发生的事,应该无法被多次AO。

另外,SU能力里面有远程攻击的(比如虚弱射线),是否还是会因为远程攻击行为而被AO?
下辈子一定要当个蛮子,免得想太多。
帕拉丁冲锋破鞋必出1,这是一种真理
每当我出carry的时候总有人抢中路,每当我出辅助的时候总让我去中单
自从当了DM,豁免骰那是一个比一个大……
[21:54] <玛多卡> .r d20+13 出1我就掀桌
[21:54] <DnDBot> 玛多卡 投擲 出1我就掀桌: 1d20+13=(1)+13=14

离线 子虚子

  • 月球厨师
  • 根源索寻者
  • *
  • 帖子数: 1039
  • 苹果币: -2
  • 今天也是脑残的一天。。。
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #1 于: 2014-04-17, 周四 23:46:22 »
远程接触攻击不是远程攻击 :em032

接触攻击:接触攻击与一般攻击不同,只须接触到对方就会造成伤害。此类法术就像是武器一样,会使敌人心生防备,因此,使用接触类法术进行接触攻击视同武器攻击,即使以接触攻击持用武器的敌人,也不会引发借机攻击。然而,施展法术的动作仍然会引发借机攻击,所以较好的策略是先施法,再移动到敌人旁边碰他。接触攻击有两种:近战接触攻击(如:用你的手接触)与远程接触攻击(如:以魔法射线接触)。无论是哪一类,都可能造成重击。受到接触攻击时,受术者的AC不包括盔甲加值、盾牌加值或天生防御加值。但体型调整值、敏捷调整值和偏斜加值,仍列入计算。

* 子虚子 立誓会用法师之前不看其他职业
* 子虚子 觉得也许我这辈子都看不到其他职业了。。。

成了!吾是万动,亦是海灵;吾是标动,吾是迅捷。吾要把万动泉的水白白的赐给没动作的人喝。——启动录21:6

——2014年1月7日,太古的群公告

Mystryl=The Hidden One=Lord Ao
参考文献:AAN Page. 49,F&A Page. 30
逻辑严谨,无懈可击(死)于是至高无上的神上神密斯瑞尔万岁万岁万万岁!


有生之年的2版学派和专精法师填坑计划:
防护,咒法,预言,塑能,幻术,附魔,死灵,变化,地,水,风,火,空间,力场,暗影,炼金,机关,几何,诗歌,野魔法,共通

防护师,咒法师,预言师,塑能师,幻术师,附魔师,死灵师,变化师,控地师,卜水师,占火师,唤风师,次元师,力能师,灵术师,影法师,炼金师,奇械师√,几何师,歌法师,狂法师

——希望有生之年能填完吧。。。


shipiaozi忧心忡忡地跟我说:“现在从3r到4E、从4R到5E,甚至还有果园的很多地方,一个歧视shipiaozi、迫害shipiaozi、虐待shipiaozi的事实联盟已经形成。人们不应该因为自己的理论就受到嘲讽,必须让世界上更多有知的人们伸出正义之手,支持清晰正确的shipiaozi理论……” “等等,”我说,“他们都怎么嘲讽你了?” “他们既不肯同意我的观点,又不肯不提实战!”shipiaozi一脸悲愤地说。


“你手中的这本书是对《龙与地下城》3.5版角色扮演游戏规则的最终修订。这本书在编制的过程中,从各种规则扩展、勘误和阐释中汇集了大量资源,是进行《龙与地下城》游戏的官方权威指南。这本书修正并阐明了规则,并且从游戏乐趣和规则简化两方面进行了适当的扩充。当现行的核心或扩展规则与本书矛盾时,一律以本书,即《万律全书》为准。如果你在进行游戏时对游戏规则产生了疑问,本书就是为解答你的疑问而问世的。”

离线 Fingertips

  • Hero
  • ****
  • 帖子数: 714
  • 苹果币: 0
  • 索尼大法好!
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #2 于: 2014-04-17, 周四 23:55:54 »
不会多次被ao
不吃
专接一切竞技场3R/pf/4E SOLO!

离线 rockroxas

  • Knight
  • ***
  • 帖子数: 583
  • 苹果币: 0
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #3 于: 2014-04-21, 周一 09:24:55 »
2L的说法是3R的施法部分,但我查了一下万律……
万律施法接触条目专门提到了不会引发AO,但接触攻击的条目似乎没提到,只是从标红的一句看似乎远程接触一样会引发AO……
劇透 -   :
Touch Attacks(page 16)
Touch attacks come in two types—melee touch attacks and ranged touch attacks. When an attack is a touch attack, your target’s AC doesn’t include any armor bonus, shield bonus, or natural armor bonus, including enhancement bonuses to these factors. All other modifi ers apply normally. To hit your target, you make a touch attack roll—ranged or melee—and all other rules that affect attack rolls still apply.

Cast touch spell (1 standard action casting time) and touch one target (page 126)
Touching an opponent with a touch spell is considered to be an armed attack and therefore doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. However, the act of casting a spell does provoke attacks of opportunity. Touch attacks to deliver touch spells follow all normal rules for touch attacks—see Touch Attacks, page 16.

而在PF里则是明确提到了,近战接触视为武装不引发AO,远程接触引发AO(因为远程武装也是照常引发)
劇透 -   :
Touch Spells in Combat: Many spells have a range of touch. To use these spells, you cast the spell and then touch the subject. In the same round that you cast the spell, you may also touch (or attempt to touch) as a free action. You may take your move before casting the spell, after touching the target, or between casting the spell and touching the target. You can automatically touch one friend or use the spell on yourself, but to touch an opponent, you must succeed on an attack roll.

Touch Attacks: Touching an opponent with a touch spell is considered to be an armed attack and therefore does not provoke attacks of opportunity. The act of casting a spell, however, does provoke an attack of opportunity. Touch attacks come in two types: melee touch attacks and ranged touch attacks. You can score critical hits with either type of attack as long as the spell deals damage. Your opponent's AC against a touch attack does not include any armor bonus, shield bonus, or natural armor bonus. His size modifier, Dexterity modifier, and deflection bonus (if any) all apply normally.

Holding the Charge: If you don't discharge the spell in the round when you cast the spell, you can hold the charge indefinitely. You can continue to make touch attacks round after round. If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges. If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates. You can touch one friend as a standard action or up to six friends as a full-round action. Alternatively, you may make a normal unarmed attack (or an attack with a natural weapon) while holding a charge. In this case, you aren't considered armed and you provoke attacks of opportunity as normal for the attack. If your unarmed attack or natural weapon attack normally doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity, neither does this attack. If the attack hits, you deal normal damage for your unarmed attack or natural weapon and the spell discharges. If the attack misses, you are still holding the charge.

Ranged Touch Spells in Combat: Some spells allow you to make a ranged touch attack as part of the casting of the spell. These attacks are made as part of the spell and do not require a separate action. Ranged touch attacks provoke an attack of opportunity, even if the spell that causes the attacks was cast defensively. Unless otherwise noted, ranged touch attacks cannot be held until a later turn.

http://www.goddessfantasy.net/bbs/index.php?topic=53136.0
话说上个帖子你不是还持一个动作可被多次AO态度的吗(
« 上次编辑: 2014-04-21, 周一 19:14:07 由 rockroxas »

离线 悲催的牧师

  • 拆迁办新人
  • Chivary
  • *****
  • 帖子数: 1068
  • 苹果币: 0
  • 知彼知己,胜乃不殆;知天知地,胜乃可全
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #4 于: 2014-04-21, 周一 10:38:53 »
今天讨论的时候,某人表示,使用灼热射线的角色,会因为“施法”和“做出射击攻击”而各自产生一个被AO的机会,但我觉得这既然是一个动作里面发生的事,应该无法被多次AO。

另外,SU能力里面有远程攻击的(比如虚弱射线),是否还是会因为远程攻击行为而被AO?
不会吃两次AO的,你为啥老是被连基本规则都没读好的人忽悠
23:32:14 <艾格隆|牧师> (要不……
23:32:22 <艾格隆|牧师> (你也大笑三声,说一句原来如此
23:32:34 <艾格隆|牧师> (看看有没有什么灵感……
23:32:45 <都市游侠丨法夫尼尔> .r d20+2 哈,哈,哈,原来如此
23:32:46 <Oicebot>  都市游侠丨法夫尼尔进行哈,哈,哈,原来如此检定: 1d20+2=3+2=5
23:32:50 <都市游侠丨法夫尼尔> (2333333
23:33:00 <都市游侠丨法夫尼尔> (做不到的事情就是做不到23333
23:33:01 <艾格隆|牧师> (错了,应该这样
23:33:15 <艾格隆|牧师> .r 1d20+2 哈!哈!哈!原来如此!!!
23:33:17 <Oicebot>  艾格隆|牧师进行哈!哈!哈!原来如此!!!检定: 1d20+2=19+2=21
23:33:34 <都市游侠丨法夫尼尔> (原来是气势的问题吗!

离线 星踪幻影

  • 根源索寻者
  • *
  • 帖子数: 3000
  • 苹果币: 1
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #5 于: 2014-04-21, 周一 16:07:49 »
2L的说法是3R的施法部分,但我查了一下万律……
万律施法接触条目专门提到了不会引发AO,但接触攻击的条目似乎没提到,只是从标红的一句看似乎远程接触一样会引发AO……
劇透 -   :
Touch Attacks(page 16)
Touch attacks come in two types—melee touch attacks and ranged touch attacks. When an attack is a touch attack, your target’s AC doesn’t include any armor bonus, shield bonus, or natural armor bonus, including enhancement bonuses to these factors. All other modifi ers apply normally. To hit your target, you make a touch attack roll—ranged or melee—and all other rules that affect attack rolls still apply.

Cast touch spell (1 standard action casting time) and touch one target (page 126)
Touching an opponent with a touch spell is considered to be an armed attack and therefore doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. However, the act of casting a spell does provoke attacks of opportunity. Touch attacks to deliver touch spells follow all normal rules for touch attacks—see Touch Attacks, page 16.

而在PF里则是明确提到了要挨AO
劇透 -   :
Touch Spells in Combat: Many spells have a range of touch. To use these spells, you cast the spell and then touch the subject. In the same round that you cast the spell, you may also touch (or attempt to touch) as a free action. You may take your move before casting the spell, after touching the target, or between casting the spell and touching the target. You can automatically touch one friend or use the spell on yourself, but to touch an opponent, you must succeed on an attack roll.

Touch Attacks: Touching an opponent with a touch spell is considered to be an armed attack and therefore does not provoke attacks of opportunity. The act of casting a spell, however, does provoke an attack of opportunity. Touch attacks come in two types: melee touch attacks and ranged touch attacks. You can score critical hits with either type of attack as long as the spell deals damage. Your opponent's AC against a touch attack does not include any armor bonus, shield bonus, or natural armor bonus. His size modifier, Dexterity modifier, and deflection bonus (if any) all apply normally.

Holding the Charge: If you don't discharge the spell in the round when you cast the spell, you can hold the charge indefinitely. You can continue to make touch attacks round after round. If you touch anything or anyone while holding a charge, even unintentionally, the spell discharges. If you cast another spell, the touch spell dissipates. You can touch one friend as a standard action or up to six friends as a full-round action. Alternatively, you may make a normal unarmed attack (or an attack with a natural weapon) while holding a charge. In this case, you aren't considered armed and you provoke attacks of opportunity as normal for the attack. If your unarmed attack or natural weapon attack normally doesn't provoke attacks of opportunity, neither does this attack. If the attack hits, you deal normal damage for your unarmed attack or natural weapon and the spell discharges. If the attack misses, you are still holding the charge.

Ranged Touch Spells in Combat: Some spells allow you to make a ranged touch attack as part of the casting of the spell. These attacks are made as part of the spell and do not require a separate action. Ranged touch attacks provoke an attack of opportunity, even if the spell that causes the attacks was cast defensively. Unless otherwise noted, ranged touch attacks cannot be held until a later turn.

http://www.goddessfantasy.net/bbs/index.php?topic=53136.0
话说上个帖子你不是还持一个动作可被多次AO态度的吗(

于素上次乃少判偶多次被AO的233
你是光,我是影。光照耀着影,影守护着光。我们是最疏离的双生子,我们是最亲密的陌生人...

离线 艾思哲

  • AD&D 2e 翻译组
  • 根源索寻者
  • *
  • 帖子数: 2551
  • 苹果币: 2
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #6 于: 2014-04-24, 周四 21:53:32 »
一个动作不会引发同一个目标多次AO的好吧。

就好像你在对方的威胁范围里面移动多格也只是吃一个AO一样。
me sooooo weeeeeeeeaak

3R法师进阶评级

离线 Stuart

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3866
  • 苹果币: 0
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #7 于: 2014-04-25, 周五 07:53:42 »
一个动作不会引发同一个目标多次AO的好吧。

就好像你在对方的威胁范围里面移动多格也只是吃一个AO一样。

引发的条件不是动作,是机会,如果有2个引发机会自然就2次AO,这里没有纠结是一个动作还是几个动作的必要
人不是什么时候都能活得光明正大,本想抬头挺胸前进,却不知何时就会沾一身泥巴。

离线 joasy

  • LG滥弱剧情党
  • Chivary
  • *****
  • 帖子数: 1185
  • 苹果币: -1
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #8 于: 2014-04-29, 周二 07:01:19 »
3R话,感觉是会的。可以这样想:某些专长是可以ao近战攻击的,那么对于有此专长的生物,近战接触攻击是否会被ao?理应是会吧?如此,能够ao远程攻击的生物,也应该能够ao远程接触攻击
版权声明:本人的一切原创内容禁止用于任何非跑团用途
本人的分区

离线 Falengel

  • Chivary
  • *****
  • 帖子数: 1352
  • 苹果币: 0
  • ウミトソラ キレイ
Re: 3R/PF 这样的搭配会被AO多次吗?
« 回帖 #9 于: 2014-05-11, 周日 16:10:19 »
Ranged Touch Attack Spells and AOOs: When you cast a spell that allows you to make a ranged touch attack (such as scorching ray), and an enemy is within reach, do you provoke two attacks of opportunity?

Yes, you provoke two attacks of opportunity: one for casting the spell and one for making a ranged attack, since these are two separate events.
(Note that at spell that fires multiple simultaneous rays, such as scorching ray, only provokes one AOO for making the ranged attack instead of one AOO for each ranged attack. It still provokes for casting the spell.
This answer originally appeared in the 9/11/12 Paizo blog.

以上引自PF官方FAQ