类法术能力在哪些情况下能够被视同法术？

[Julien]

sp是否与法术等同？（Yes，在此种情况下sp可以视为spell；No，正相反）

【CRB】专注，Yes。借机，Yes。防御式施法，Yes。
【CRB】对抗SR，Yes。
【CRB】被解除魔法解除，Yes。被反魔场之类的效果压制，Yes。法术反制or被法术反制，No。
【CRB】超魔专长，No。【CRB FAQ】超魔权杖，No。
【CRB FAQ】作为造物时的前置条件，Yes。作为造物专长的前置条件，No。
【CRB FAQ】作为法表以启动魔杖、卷轴，No。
【CRB FAQ】作为前置条件（可以施放某法术），仅当说明具体的法术名时，Yes。拥有sp任意门不能被视为“可施放奥术”或“可施放2环奥术“
【CRB FAQ】法术辨识-正在施放的法术，看情况。【Julien】usually Yes。
【B4 180页例子-Leanan Sidhe】法术专攻（某学派）对该学派sp，Yes。（Julien怀疑应该也有反面的例子）


        btw，该问题其实有个上级规则（general rule），CRB三次提到，sp就如同同名的法术一般运作。

Spell-Like Abilities: Usually, a spell-like ability works just like the spell of that name. A spell-like ability has no verbal, somatic, or material component, nor does it require a focus. The user activates it mentally. Armor never affects a spell-like ability’s use, even if the ability resembles an arcane spell with a somatic component.

Spell-Like Abilities (Sp): Spell-like abilities function just like spells, but are granted through a special racial ability or by a specific class ability (as opposed to spells, which are gained by spellcasting classes as a character gains levels).

Spell-Like Abilities (Sp): Spell-like abilities, as the name implies, are magical abilities that are very much like spells. Spell-like abilities are subject to spell resistance and dispel magic. They do not function in areas where magic is suppressed or negated (such as an antimagic field). Spell-like abilities can be dispelled, but they cannot be counterspelled or used to counterspell.

        不过对于是否将这样的话认定为规则语言，我们尚存在争议。诸所周知，function as，expect..表示除此之外皆与某某相同。此处的works just like 和 function（work） just like是否能等同于function as ？我个人倾向于是，不过尚未有定论。

[Julien]

我们真正遇到的问题其实是，影响法术的专长或职业能力能否作用于sp。
比如，高等召唤（Superior Summoning）、多功能召唤生物（Versatile Summon Monster）能否作用于召唤师、法师变体秘学士的sp召唤？目前好像通常是判可以。

[kataaaka]

Augment Summoning: Does this feat apply to monsters summoned with summon monster or summon nature's ally spell-like abilities?
Yes.

posted November 2013

[希尔]

不能。除了增强召唤一直被点名，其他专长除非自己说明（比如多功能召唤特地说了其他模拟法术的能力