【法术疑惑】撕扯肢体这个异能的豁免是怎么个事？

[我因昵称中有某个名字而被扣了2......]

说是见描述，但描述里没看到有豁免什么事

你使用念力撕扯目标生物的身体，将它的肢体一个个折断。目标生物承受每个你的施法者等级1d6点伤害（最大10d6点伤害）。如果这个法术造成了超过目标最大生命值一半的伤害，目标的一个肢体（随机选择）会被凶残地从身体上撕扯下来，并且会被随机抛到距离该生物15尺远的位置。目标承受每2个你的施法者等级1点流血伤害。该流血效果可以通过DC 15的医疗鉴定或者任何治疗生命值的效果来终止。但是断裂的肢体只能通过强力的治疗效果复原，例如医疗术（Heal）或者再生术（Regeneration）。如果伤害将目标的生命值降低到0以下，它所有的肢体都会受到上述效果影响。
没有可以辨识的解剖结构或者肢体的生物不受撕扯肢体影响。

[216aaaa]

设计师忘记了

[216aaaa]

from the product thread, the designer chimed in

Jeremy Smith wrote:
So, uh... I wrote that a while back and looking at my notes... I believe I intended that the Fort save would block the limb from being removed, but you'd still suffer full damage... but I might have also intended it to reduce the damage, but not the limb removal. I'm PRETTY sure it was to block the limb from being removed, but I'm not 100% sure.

That's a mixup on my part for not putting that explanation in there, but I don't want to claim official ruling on that.

产品设计线索那个地方的设计师回复

[我因昵称中有某个名字而被扣了2......]

from the product thread, the designer chimed in

Jeremy Smith wrote:
So, uh... I wrote that a while back and looking at my notes... I believe I intended that the Fort save would block the limb from being removed, but you'd still suffer full damage... but I might have also intended it to reduce the damage, but not the limb removal. I'm PRETTY sure it was to block the limb from being removed, but I'm not 100% sure.

That's a mixup on my part for not putting that explanation in there, but I don't want to claim official ruling on that.

产品设计线索那个地方的设计师回复

23333
前有伤害1d0，现有豁免被遗忘

谢了

[216aaaa]

from the product thread, the designer chimed in

Jeremy Smith wrote:
So, uh... I wrote that a while back and looking at my notes... I believe I intended that the Fort save would block the limb from being removed, but you'd still suffer full damage... but I might have also intended it to reduce the damage, but not the limb removal. I'm PRETTY sure it was to block the limb from being removed, but I'm not 100% sure.

That's a mixup on my part for not putting that explanation in there, but I don't want to claim official ruling on that.

产品设计线索那个地方的设计师回复

23333
前有伤害1d0，现有豁免被遗忘

谢了

没事，之前搜过这个问题，因为设计师不打算弄官方裁决所以只能问dm的看法，如果按照无豁免来判加上异能者升阶这个法术挺强的

[我因昵称中有某个名字而被扣了2......]

from the product thread, the designer chimed in

Jeremy Smith wrote:
So, uh... I wrote that a while back and looking at my notes... I believe I intended that the Fort save would block the limb from being removed, but you'd still suffer full damage... but I might have also intended it to reduce the damage, but not the limb removal. I'm PRETTY sure it was to block the limb from being removed, but I'm not 100% sure.

That's a mixup on my part for not putting that explanation in there, but I don't want to claim official ruling on that.

产品设计线索那个地方的设计师回复

23333
前有伤害1d0，现有豁免被遗忘

谢了

没事，之前搜过这个问题，因为设计师不打算弄官方裁决所以只能问dm的看法，如果按照无豁免来判加上异能者升阶这个法术挺强的

  其实我对这种呆逼设计师写的法术抱有极大恶意，个人倾向于豁免过则伤害减半且无论伤害多少绝不断肢或者过则无伤

[216aaaa]

3r讨论区你问的那个，我了解的其实也只有那些

[我因昵称中有某个名字而被扣了2......]

3r讨论区你问的那个，我了解的其实也只有那些

好吧

[greenskin]

p子小书设计师记忆力只有3行，换3行只会前言不搭后语很常见